ladylilithprime:

After-Action

Okay, episode good points:

  • Mary and alt!Bobby!
  • Sam and Jack father/son vibe!
  • Lucifer revealed to be exactly the sick and twisted assbutt we all know and loathe!
  • Sam being all protective of Jack!
  • Lucifer dead, and Sam helped do it!
  • Jack and Sam are still alive!

Episode not-so-good points:

  • Sam in the unenviable position of having to explain why this universe is supposed to be better than the “Apocalypse Happened” world.
  • Jack, no, self-destructive tendencies are not what you should be inheriting from your Dad.
  • Lucifer still managing to twist Jack up with his lies.
  • Alt!Michael.
  • Dean, you self-sacrificing idjit.
  • Sam, you self-sacrificing idjit!!
  • Alt!Michael is now running loose in his True Vessel.

Points not covered by the episode which could go either way:

  • Death is keeping tabs on the Winchesters.
  • Angels are essentially “extinct in the wild”.
  • Too many people dying out of turn or coming back to life upsets Fate, resulting in the sudden need to “redress the scales”.

And now we have alt!Michael running around in a slightly ragged but still never-been-worn Dean!suit. Call me cynical, but I don’t see alt!Michael being all that concerned over saving the angels, given his previous evidence of crazy lack of concern over killing his brothers.

On the other hand, Dean is finally taking his turn as an “angel condom” and will hopefully come out of the experience with a lot more respect for Sam’s autonomy and strength of will. Additionally, while the Bunker Brigade is going to be Very Unhappy about having a crazy Archangel running around wearing Dean, this is more of a chance for Sam and Jack to bond, Sam and Mary to bond, Jack and Castiel to bond…. Basically, it opens up a lot of bonding possibilities without everyone revolving around Dean’s presence. (His absence, on the other hand….)

Essentially, I’m cautiously hopeful for season fourteen and the cast’s assertion that Sam and Dean will be taking a step back from their unhealthy codependency dynamic. Whether optimistic character growth or soul-crushing wankery wins out, well… Guess we’ll find out in September!

osberend:

iopele:

suspendnodisbelief:

naamahdarling:

optimysticals:

youwantmuchmore:

thebestoftumbling:

golden eagle having a relaxing time

This is the world’s largest flying Engine of Murder marveling at the fact that it can actually have its tummy rubbed.

I feel like this is the next step up on “loose your fingers” roulette from petting a kittie’s tummy, but just below belly rubs for say a lion.

Can someone who knows birds better than I do tell me whether this eagle is as happy as it looks?  Because I want it to be happy.  It looks so happy.  Bewildered by having a friend, but so happy.

Just popping on this thread to confirm: yes, the eagle is happy about the belly rubs. Golden eagles make this sound when receiving allopreening and similar affectionate and soothing treatment from their parents and mates. It’s the “I am safe and well fed, and somebody familiar is taking good care of me” sound. Angry raptors and wounded raptors make some pretty dramatic hisses and shrieks; frightened raptors go dead silent and try to hide if they can, or fluff up big and get loud and in-your-face if hiding isn’t an option. They can easily sever a finger or break the bones of a human hand or wrist, and even with a very thick leather falconer’s gauntlet, I’ve known falconers to leave a mews (hawk house) with graphic punctures THROUGH the gauntlet into the meat of their hands and arms, just from buteos and kestrels way smaller than this eagle. A pissed off hawk will make damn sure you don’t try twice whatever you pulled that pissed her off, even if she’s been human-imprinted.

If you’re ever unsure about an animal’s level of okayness with something that’s happening, there are three spot-check questions you can ask, to common-sense your way through it:

1. Is the animal capable of defending itself or making a threatening or fearful display, or otherwise giving protest, and if so, is it using this ability? (e.g. dog snarling or biting, swan hissing, horse kicking or biting) 

2. Does the animal experience an incentive-based relationship with the human? (i.e. does the animal have a reason, in the animal’s frame of reference, for being near this human? e.g. dog sharing companionship / food / shelter, hawk receiving good quality abundant food and shelter and medical care from a falconer)

3. Is the animal a domesticated species, with at least a full century of consistent species cohabitation with humans? (Domesticated animals frequently are conditioned from birth or by selective breeding to be unbothered by human actions that upset their feral nearest relatives.)

In this situation, YES the eagle can self-defend, YES the eagle has incentive to cooperate with and trust the human handler, and NO the eagle is not a domesticated species, meaning we can expect a high level of reactivity to distress, compared to domestic animals: if the eagle was distressed, it would be pretty visible and apparent to the viewer. These aren’t a universally applicable metric, but they’re a good start for mammal and bird interactions.

Pair that with the knowledge that eagles reserve those chirps for calm environments, and you can be pretty secure and comfy in the knowledge that the big honkin’ birb is happy and cozy.

Also, to anybody wondering, falconers are almost single-handedly responsible for the recovery from near-extinction of several raptor species, including and especially peregrine falcons. Most hawks only live with the falconer for a year, and most of that year is spent getting the bird in ideal condition for survival and success as a wild breeding adult. Falconers are extensively trained and dedicated wildlife conservationists, pretty much by definition, especially in the continental USA, and they make up an unspeakably important part of the overall conservation of predatory bird species. Predatory birds are an important part of every ecosystem they inhabit. Just like apiarists and their bees, the relationship between falconer and hawk is one of great benefit to the animal and the ecosystem, in exchange for a huge amount of time, effort, expense, and education on the part of the human, for very little personal benefit to that one human. It’s definitely not exploitation of the bird, and most hawks working with falconers are hawks who absolutely would not have reached adulthood without human help: the sick, the injured, and the “runts” of the nest who don’t receive adequate resources from their own parents. These are, by and large, wonderful people who are in love with the natural world and putting a lifetime of knowledge and sheer exhausting work into conserving it and its winged wonders.

reblogged for excellent info, I’m so glad that big gorgeous birb really is as happy as it looks!

Today’s bit of positive activism: A reminder that, although the world may contain many bad and awful things, it also contains an enormous winged predator clucking happily as a human gives it a belly rub.